Scientists to Rebut Presidential Candidates’ Narrative of Climate Crisis at MSNBC Forum at Georgetown University

CO2 Coalition to Explain the False Claims Being Made by Climate Alarmists  Arlington, VA – Two scientists with the CO2 Coalition have been invited by the Georgetown University College Republicans to speak at “Climate Forum: A Rebuttal” at 7 pm on Thursday evening, September 19, in Healy 103. The event will come at the conclusion 

Continue Reading…

No Need for Energy Poverty

By Derrick Hollie It’s a popular theme—from Thomas Malthus to Paul R. Ehrlich to Thanos of Avengers fame: Only drastic action will avert catastrophe. We must consume less, accept less, be less. We’re warned in ever more strident terms that we must act now or in 12 years (or 10 years or 18 months) there will be 

Continue Reading…

Untouched by climate change reality

By Richard W. Rahn If the government had not spent any tax dollars trying to mitigate climate change during the last 30 years, how much warmer would it have been and how much higher would the sea level be? The correct answer is, no measurable change. To the extent that mankind has an influence on 

Continue Reading…

Common Sense versus Climate Hysteria

by Joel Kotkin Whether it’s fires in California or Brazil, hurricanes like Dorian or your summer hot spell, it’s not just weather anymore but a sign of the impending apocalypse. This specter of imminent demise tied to the everyday, notes one American Psychological Association study, has induced “stress, depression and anxiety” among a wide part 

Continue Reading…

Global Warming or Bad Data?

By John Steele Gordon Al Gore likes to say that the science of climate change is “settled.” But of course, science, almost by definition, is never settled. And climate science has always suffered from the problem of shaky and missing data. Seventy percent of the globe is covered by ocean, where data is hard to 

Continue Reading…

Steve and John Make the Climate Blacklist!

By Steven Hayward Nature Communications, a former science publication, disgraced itself this week with an article that goes to absurd lengths to indict the media for giving equal time to “climate change contrarians” (though the “denier” epithet turns up for duty soon enough) over “expert climate change scientists,” among whom they include, for example, the 

Continue Reading…

The latest travesty in ‘consensus enforcement’

By Judith Curry The latest travesty in consensus ‘enforcement’, published by Nature. There is a new paper published in Nature, entitled Discrepancies in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. Abstract. We juxtapose 386 prominent contrarians with 386 expert scientists by tracking their digital footprints across ∼200,000 research publications and ∼100,000 

Continue Reading…